Ashford Borough Council LDF Housing issues Local Needs Housing Draft South East Plan Comment

Read the Pluckley Design Statement (.pdf)

This Design Statement has been formally adopted by Ashford Borough Council as Supplementary Planning Guidance. The document expresses the many views held by Pluckley residents involved with its preparation. In adopting the Design Statement the council is not necessarily supporting all of these opinions, but is undertaking to take into consideration the design guidelines included when making planning decisions. The council does not have sufficient powers as a planning authority to require these design guidelines to be met in all cases and the active support and commitment of developers, landowners, and householders is also essential.

The guidance in this document is intended to supplement and support the policies of the Ashford Borough Local Plan 2000.

divider

Ashford Borough Council Local Development Framework
& Pluckley Parish Council

Pluckley Parish Council has been carefully following the course of the Local Development Framework and at the request of Ashford Borough Council produced a 'Parish Wish List' (a basic parish plan) in 2003, and submitted an amendment in 2004

During the consultation period regular reports were given at Parish Council meetings [see Minutes 2003 - page 918; Minutes 2004 - pages 968 & 969; Minutes 2005 - pages 1002, 1013, 1017, 1018, 1022; Minutes 2006 - pages 1038, 1042, 1044, 1051, 1054, 1058, 1067, 1071; Minutes 2007 - pages 1094 and 1118; Minutes 2008 - pages 1119, 1126, 1140, 1143, 1146,]and as written reports [August 2005 July 2007.] Please note: these references may not be all-inclusive. If you are able to find any others please do contact us.

Following a meeting on 3 March 2006 between Ian Grundy (ABC Planning), Andrew Wickham, Ann Murray, and the Clerk to the Council, the parish council wrote formally to Richard Alderton of Ashford Borough Council requesting that a clause be included within the Ashford Borough Council LDF document, prior to its submission to the government in May, to the effect that “rural villages should not be precluded from future development if such development included proven needed village amenities.” Read report

A Public Inquiry on ABC's Draft Core Strategy was held in early 2008 and a letter was sent to him in March 2008. Email to members

Any areas within those villages will not be earmarked until the final details are put out for public consultation and those areas will be determined by Ashford Borough Council. Folowing the Inspector's report, Pluckley was provisionally included in the Tier 3 group of 8 villages. [ABC letter 2 July 2008 ]

On 15 September 2008, Ashford Borough Council booked Pluckley Village Hall for a community workshop. They requested that no more than 30 Pluckley residents, representing a good cross-section of the parish were invited to attend. This workshop was abandoned, and it was hoped that another one can be arranged in November. *

The parish council, discussed the comments so far received from members of the community at a full parish council meeting held on 22 September 2008, and resolved that:“Now that we know, as a result of the recent responses to the Parish Plan, that the majority of the village is not in favour of development under the LDF, the Parish Council wishes to express its opposition to Pluckley receiving development as a Tier 3 village. This in no way affects our support for Local Needs housing for local people, which the Parish Plan responses also supported, and to which we have already agreed to 8-10 units." A letter to this effect was sent to Ashford Borough Council. A reply was received on 1 November 2008. On 20 November 2008 the parish council sent a letter in response.
Ashford replied on 5 December 2008 and a further letter with attachment from PIN was received from Ashford Borough Council on 9 January 2008. Pluckley Parish Council's reply was sent on 28 January 2009.

* Ashford Borough Council held another community workshop to discuss the LDF Tenterden and Rural Sites DPD on Thursday 29 January 2009. Ashford's minutes of the meeting

On 20 April 2009, following a question asked at Ashford Borough Council's Parish Forum,
the following email was sent to all parishes:

At the parish forum meeting last week there was a question asked as to whether houses built on sites that are not allocated for development (windfall sites) can count towards the housing numbers that have to be provided in the rural areas during the core strategy plan period.

To avoid any confusion the answer is that they cannot be counted during the period 2006 – 2016 to reduce the amount of land allocated during that period.  What the Council may be able to do, when the Strategy is formally reviewed, is to count up the completions that have taken place between 2006 and 2016 and see if more housing has been provided than expected and if it has to then consider reducing the level of allocations for new sites then.  Of course 2016 is a long way off and we will have to see what the situation in terms of housing need and provision is at that time. 

This approach is explained in paragraphs 6.2 and 6.3 of the Core Strategy as follows

“6.2 Extrapolating the residential target for the Borough as a whole in policy HP1 of the Kent and Medway Structure Plan, and comparing it with the emerging Regional Guidance figure for the Growth Area, suggests that 1,500 additional dwellings will be required in the rural parts of the Borough over the period 2001-2021. The Tenterden & Rural Sites DPD will consider in more detail whether this figure represents a sustainable balanced growth target for the rural area of the Borough.

6.3 In recent years development on windfall sites in the rural area has averaged about 35 dwellings annually. However, to comply with PPS3 no reliance is placed on windfalls for the first 10 years of the Core Strategy, but a notional

175 windfall units allowance is assumed over the period 2016-2021. The validity of this assumption will be reconsidered when the Core Strategy is reviewed. Taking into account completions in the rural area between 2001 and 2006 this indicates a need to make allocations for about 1000 dwellings based on the 1,500 overall figure referred to above.

Rural Housing Requirement 2006 – 2021

Ashford Rural Area 2001 – 2021

1500 units

Completions - Local Plan allocations 2001-06

143 units

Completions - windfall sites 2001-06

177 units

Assumed windfalls at 35 p.a. 2016 - 2021

175 units

Rural residual requirement 2006 - 2021

1005 units

I hope this helps explain any misunderstanding

Yours sincerely
Martin Vink
Development Control Manager
Ashford Borough Council
tel: 01233 330249
email: martin.vink@ashford.gov.uk

The parish council cannot enter into any consultation with interested landowners if the parish council are desirous to make representations to Ashford Borough Council as to preferred sites as the parish council would be compromised.

go to the Ashford LDF Adopted Core Strategy download a copy of Acrobat Reader (to open pdf files)
ABC Core Strategy Adoption Statement  
Background Documents to the Core Strategy Tenterden & Rural Sites
Ashford LDF Core Strategy: Inspector's report Tenterden & Rural Sites DPD
Core Strategy Publications List  
Draft Affordable Housing SPD The LDF, the SE Plan, and Gypsy & Traveller Sites
Tenterden & Rural sites DPD Consultation LDF site comments at public meetings

Proposed changes to the Draft South East Plan

Pluckley Parish Council has been consulted on the Secretary of State’s proposed changes to the Draft Regional Spatial Strategy for the South East.

Views on these changes and the accompanying draft Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulation Assessment are now sought and letters from the Government Office for the South East and the Department for Communities and Local Government have been sent t all of the regions local authorities, parish council’s, MPs, MEPs, and all who took part on the Public Examination.

It is being made widely available for public inspection at local authority offices and libraries. Copies will also be available from the Government Office for the South East and on the internet at www.gose.gov.uk/gose/planning/regionalPlanning

The twelve week consultation period on the Proposed Changes and draft Sustainability Appraisal/Habitats Regulation Assessment started on 17 July 2008 and ends at 5pm on Friday 24 October. Government will then assess these responses and prepare the final version.

How to Respond

Consultees are asked to express their views on the Proposed Changes and Draft Sustainability Appraisal/Habitats Regulation Assessment by using the online consultation portal, which includes an online response form. This is to be found, together with the other documents on the Government Office website at www.gose.gov.uk/gose/planning/regionalPlanning
Alternatively, a paper response form is available. This can be downloaded from the GOSE website or requested from the government Office. The response form also enables views to be expresses on the Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Proposed Changes.
Forms can be requested and sent:
By email to rss@gose.gsi.gov.uk
By fax to 01483 8822489
By post to: Regional Spatial Strategies Team,
Government Office for the South East
Bridge House
1 Walnut Tree Close
Guildford GU1 4GA

The deadline for consultation responses on the Proposed Changes and the Sustainability Appraisal is 5pm on Friday 24 October 2008. Please do not send duplicate responses in more than one format.

Richard Lemon, Head of Housing and Planning, at the Government Office for the South East writes:

… This is an important step in the review of the Regional Spatial Strategy within which there are three main stages. For South East region, these stages are as follows:

The South East of England Regional Assembly prepared a draft RSS between 2003 and 2006. The Assembly submitted this draft to Government on 31 March 2006. A period of public consultation then drew over 7,000 responses from over 350 separate individuals and organisations. A copy of this draft can be found on the Assembly’s website at www.southeast-ra.gov.uk

An independent Panel of Planning Inspectors examined the draft South East Plan and comments made at an Examination in Public (November 2006 to March 2007), testing it for soundness. Their report of their recommended changes can be viewed on the GOSE website at www.gose.gov.uk/gose/planning/regionalPlanning

Following publication of the Panel’s report in August 2007 the Government is now in the process of finalising the Plan. Legislation required that after the Examination on Public the Governments must publish and consult on any ’proposed changes’ it intends to make to the draft RSS revision.
“As part of the Proposed Changes the Government must publish a ‘statement of reasons’, showing why changes have been made to the draft. Regulations and guidance also leave scope for discretion about the best way to present proposed changes and the statement of reasons, depending on the complexity and types of changes and reasons.

“In the case of the South East Plan the following format has been used:

For consultation
A Schedule of Changes. This document sets out tables of the changes proposed to be made, together with the Secretary of State’s reasoning for making the changes. The introduction to the Proposed Changes document explains the format of these tables.
A separate draft Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulation Assessment report. This report, prepared by Scott Wilson and Levett-Therivel consultants is part of an ongoing technical process designed to inform the preparation of the plan.
It is these documents that are being made available for public consultation, and your views are sought.

Not for consultation
A Separate Companion Document showing what the final plan would look like if all the changes set out were to be incorporated. This document is for information and is intended to help the reader understand the implications of the Proposed Changes. It is not open for consultation as much of it contains policy and text from the original Assembly draft, which is not proposed to be changed. A full ‘tracked changes’ document has not been compiled (as in other regions) as it was considered that such a document would be excessively long and unwieldy in light if the extent of the changes made, particularly in terms of change to the structure of the draft and the amount of supporting text that has been deleted.”

Parmjit Dhanda MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Department for Communities and Local Government writes:

“…The Proposed Changes take account of the recommendations of the independent Panel which examined the draft between November 2006 and March 2007, and the recommendations of a combined Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulation Assessment which is also published today…

“… The Schedule sets out the changes proposed by the Secretary of State and the reasons why these are proposed. For clarity, and to assist consultees, we are also publishing a separate ‘companion’ document showing what the final South East Plan would look like if all the changes were incorporated.

“The Panel Report largely supported the draft submitted by the Regional Assembly but concluded that it gave insufficient weight to economic and demographic factors. The Secretary of State is proposing to incorporate the majority of the recommendations made by the Panel, but some recommendations have not been accepted, and some additional changes are also proposed to ensure that the Regional Spatial Strategy is aligned with national policy.

 “The following key changes are proposed in addition to those recommended by the Panel;

  • An increase in the regional housing figure to an annual figure of 33,125, from 32,000 in the Panel report - a total of 662,500 over the plan period. This provides for a 15% increase in net additional dwellings over the figure proposed in the draft South East Plan, and 4% over that recommended by the Panel
  • The identification of eight Strategic Development Areas (SDAs). In addition to those sites either in the original draft or recommended by the Panel, new SDAs are proposed at Milton Keynes (housing figures remain as identified by the Panel but comprise an additional uplift to accommodate a new SDA and a reduction to take out allocations identified by the Panel in the East of England), Shoreham and Whitehill/Bordon. An SDA south west of Reading recommended by the Panel has not been included in the draft because of concerns about its potential impact on flood risk
  • A new policy on Thames Basin Heaths to encourage joint working in local authority clusters, taking on board elements of the draft delivery plan
  • Targets for renewable energy in new development to be set locally, using the Assembly’s suggested requirement of 10% as a starting point
  • Aligning the definition of ‘smart growth’ with the Regional Economic Strategy
  • Deletion of the Strategic Gap policy in line with Planning Policy Statement 7 (Sustainable Development in Rural Areas)
  • Amendments to policy and supporting text on infrastructure to strengthen the requirement for use of existing infrastructure and encourage demand management
  • Tightening of policies in the draft RSS on community and social infrastructure provision
  • Various amendments in response to the Sustainability Appraisal and the Habitats Regulations Assessment

j) Strengthening of policy on Green Infrastructure

k) Amendments to policy on water efficiency to acknowledge the relationship between the spatial planning system and ongoing amendments to building regulations, in line with the supplement to Planning Policy Statement 1(Planning and Climate Change)

“In addition the Secretary of State has amended the draft to follow the structure recommended by the Panel in Appendix B of their report to help reduce the length of the document and to provide a more concise and regionally specific vision which does not repeat national policy. In particular the sub regional elements of the draft have been amended to reduce length and remove duplication with core policies. We welcome any views on how it could be made more concise.

“This letter and the documents are being sent to all of the Region’s local authorities, parish councils, MPs, MEPs and all those who took part in the Public Examination. It is being made widely available for public inspection at local authority offices and libraries. Copies will also be available from the Government Office for the South East and on the internet (www.gose.gov.uk/gose/planning/regionalPlanning) Responses should be sent to GOSE by 24 October 2008 and should be made via the online ‘consultation portal’ accessed via the GOSE website. A paper response form is also available.

 “As required by the Regulations I would be obliged if you would make these documents available for inspection at your offices and, on your website, either publish the documents and details of how they can be accessed, or a link to the appropriate GOSE website. Copies for this purpose will be sent under separate cover.

“Publication of the Proposed Changes is an important step in putting in place a strategy to deal with the challenges that the South East faces over the next two decades, and I look forward to the Assembly’s response to the Proposed Changes.”